Sunday, May 22, 2011

kate winslet titanic portrait

kate winslet titanic portrait. Shahid kapoor kate winslet
  • Shahid kapoor kate winslet



  • Chris Bangle
    Jul 28, 08:21 AM
    at microsoft the name they had to choose from were probably ipod killer or zune, and someone obviously chose zune....... what an idiot. it like fords new s-max which is reffered to as smack eg smacking ure kids...





    kate winslet titanic portrait. of Kate Winslet#39;s famous
  • of Kate Winslet#39;s famous



  • DewGuy1999
    Jan 30, 12:11 AM
    http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61KATOa7pCL._SL500_AA300_.jpg





    kate winslet titanic portrait. Tags: Titanic Kate Winslet
  • Tags: Titanic Kate Winslet



  • Yannick
    Oct 24, 08:26 AM
    I've currently got a single 1GB stick in a three year old PB - will that be OK to swap into a new MBP?
    Iain

    Nope.





    kate winslet titanic portrait. affairs in titanic Kate
  • affairs in titanic Kate



  • trainguy77
    Oct 15, 05:58 PM
    it looks to me that we are still ranked 59. and the next group is about to pass us!

    but yes, talking about it more here helps out quite a bit. the more we interact here, the better

    We lost our spot again. We passed Team Lithuania for a brief time as yesterday was a big day for us and a bad one for them.



    more...


    kate winslet titanic portrait. Kate Winslet Titanic Photo
  • Kate Winslet Titanic Photo



  • mc68k
    Oct 6, 06:09 PM
    ^ have you tried the bigadv units with your macpro?





    kate winslet titanic portrait. Brave face: Kate Winslet
  • Brave face: Kate Winslet



  • NicoleRichie
    Nov 6, 02:39 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

    2 gen iPad 3G (ha ha), and a 240 GB SSD for my MB optical drive replacement.



    more...


    kate winslet titanic portrait. Kate Winslet debated whether
  • Kate Winslet debated whether



  • alexf
    Oct 18, 07:16 PM
    Aaaand in 3 ... 2 ... 1:

    REALITY CHECK.

    This is why I posted my comment correcting your innaccurate assumption that "the iPod is still Apple's cash cow".

    The funny part is that I was in no way "defending" the iPod, since I don't have one at the moment and was just as annoyed at Apple as everyone else that Macs were not centerstage... in '04 and '05.

    We're rounding out '06 and that argument hasn't held water since last year.

    It's been ALL about Mac in '06

    He he... I told you this would get emotional! :)

    And by the way, you may want to look up "cash cow" in the dictionary. It has nothing to do with a product representing the MAJORITY of a company's income.





    kate winslet titanic portrait. Kate Winslet
  • Kate Winslet



  • deloreanz
    Mar 15, 05:56 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

    Well I got to see Mystikal and Hasan Daddy get theirs after my failed attempt at Irvine spectrum. I was the Asian guy with the buzz cut hair. Unfortunately I got to Fashion Island to late. Congrats to you two!

    Same here, I was the guy who went to south coast plaza first.



    more...


    kate winslet titanic portrait. kate winslet Titanic
  • kate winslet Titanic



  • biggerbearbrian
    Oct 19, 09:03 AM
    *sigh* How many times do we have to refute your assertions with facts before you stop repeating them?

    To wit, the iPod is not Apple's "cash cow". By definition, if there is something that gains more revenue/profit than the iPod, then the iPod cannot be the cash cow. 58% of Apple's revenue still came from sales of Macs. Gross margins for both Macs and iPods has always been similar (hovering a bit below 30%), so the Mac also generates the majority of the profit for Apple.

    As for Apple's innovative spirit lacking when it comes to the Macs, let's just point out that it Apple updated the iPod in October 2005 to the 5th generation, and we JUST got the 5.5th generation last month. Apple took a year to add slightly brighter screens, better battery life (only for video), and games. The nano just gained the anodized aluminum exterior -- wow, Apple's reaching back to the past for it's innovation now! And the shuffle got slimmed down and consolidated into one product. All this doesn't sound exactly like innovation to me. (Of course, Apple doesn't really need to innovate, since they're already selling iPods by the boatload.)

    In contrast, Apple brought all of its Macs over to the Intel processor. The Mac Pro was dramatically higher value, what with double-wide graphics card slot, dual optical drives, 4 internal hard drive bays, etc., etc. All Macs (except for the Mac Pro) now have Front Row and a remote, which is a great feature. Built-in iSights have also migrated across the entire product line. The MacBook and MacBook Pro now have MagSafe -- a great innovation. Boot Camp is now supported on all new Macs. The Xserve has new features like lights-out management, redundant power supplies, etc. And we've seen some great things coming for Leopard, what with Time Machine and Spaces and iChat Theater and Core Animation and iCal Server, etc., etc., etc.

    It seems to me that Apple is innovating more on the Macintosh side of things than they are with the iPod. What are they going to add next on the iPod -- wireless? *gasp*, so innovative!

    Seriously, can we stop with this myth already? It's the same thing with all of Apple's "woes" with quality control (which was busted by the recent consumer reports articles where Apple has actually brought DOWN the number of new computers needing repair in their first year). It's something that's repeated ad nauseum by a few vocal people, when it's really not a problem at all. Same here: everybody gawks and writes about the iPod precisely because more people can afford it and more people can use it with whatever computer they have. So, obviously, you will hear more about the iPod.

    Let's see if repeating myself again has any effect: the iPod is not Apple's cash cow!

    Understood now?

    OK, now fire away :rolleyes:


    I think the argument can go either way. While iPod (which I love btw) is less than half Apple revenue ok. But if they were to just add the iPod line today, and have the amount of revenue they are reporting from it, the financial report would be "iPod has given us nearly a 100% increase in revenue".

    So get some hershey's syrup, cause we got milk.





    kate winslet titanic portrait. Kate Winslet, Leonardo Di
  • Kate Winslet, Leonardo Di



  • macrumormonger
    Apr 12, 12:09 AM
    Currently on ebay as I'm about to part with it. :( What a beautiful lens.

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5103/5611212257_8cf1d39515_b.jpg


    Camera Canon EOS REBEL T2i
    Exposure 0.02 sec (1/50)
    Aperture f/4.0
    Focal Length 27 mm
    ISO Speed 2000



    more...


    kate winslet titanic portrait. kate winslet titanic drawing
  • kate winslet titanic drawing



  • Sky Blue
    Aug 15, 01:53 PM
    Aww, no more blue filling up URL bar in Safari?

    I like the definition in Spotlight





    kate winslet titanic portrait. Titanic portrait Kate Winslet,
  • Titanic portrait Kate Winslet,



  • WillEH
    Apr 14, 02:54 PM
    Great, downloading it. Hope it fixes battery drain :)



    more...


    kate winslet titanic portrait. #39;Titanic#39; co-star Gloria
  • #39;Titanic#39; co-star Gloria



  • Queso
    Jul 25, 11:26 AM
    What if he is?
    Then good for him, but if he's that much of a power user, he's looking at a redesign of the PowerMac case, not a mini-tower.

    Point is that there ARE lots of people who like to expand their systems.
    Yeah, lots of gamers. But they aren't going to buy Macs anyway are they?

    To them, iMac is completely unsuitable, and PowerMac is simply too much (too much space, too much technology, too much money, you name it). There have been LOTS of people saying that they would love to see a relatively inexpensive Mac that is expandable. iMac is not that. Neither is PowerMac.
    You want a huge selection of models, each one suited to your particular needs? Apple tried the multiple models approach back in the 90s and nearly went bankrupt as a result. Keeping the range small means they have tight control on inventory and can dedicate the Apple Stores to showing what Macs can do. So far it's brought the company a lot of money.

    What happens if the screen in the iMac breaks down? The whole computer becomes useless. What if you need faster vid-card? you have to buy a new computer. All-in-one has it's benefits, but it has it's drawbacks, and there are lots of people who do not want those drawbacks.
    You may as well throw these criticisms at laptops. However, they sell. Apple mini-towers traditionally don't.

    Yes, minitower (for example) has it's drawbacks as well, but there are lots of people who would be willing to accept those drawback for the benefits such a system offers.
    But obviously not enough from the studies Apple have conducted, otherwise where is it?

    Well good for you. How that helps ME is beyond me.
    Just showing how the iMac does have "desirability" for hundreds of thousands of real buyers, something some posters here seem to refute.

    Are we using somekind of miniature-desks or something? I have a rather typical desk, and it currently has a Mac Mini, a TFT-screen, old, huge printer that does not work, and it still has plenty of space for mouse, keyboard and other items.
    Yeah, I used to have one of those, then I realised how much wasted space it was causing and ditched it for a smaller one. You obviously live in a bigger place than me, but then for me it's location, location, location :)

    And that "small metallic box" means that your iMac loses that all-in-one elegance it now has.
    I don't care about "all-in-one elegance". I didn't buy an iMac because it matches the curtains. I just want something that takes up minimum space. The iMac does that perfectly.

    Some of us would be willing to accept that. A minitower would consume about as much desk-space as two Mac Mini's. That's more than reasonable IMO.
    But only SOME of you. Why aren't Apple releasing a mini-tower? Jobs' arrogance or because they don't think it'll sell in enough quantity to justify it? As for two Mac minis, the case would have to be a standard depth to fit standard parts, otherwise we're back in the realm of special Mac versions of hardware.

    Let's wait and see what comes out at WWDC. The G5 case had to be enormous for cooling reasons. The MacPro might be a lot smaller, fitting your requirements much closer whilst keeping Apple's range in check.





    kate winslet titanic portrait. Kate Winslet middot; Kate Winslet
  • Kate Winslet middot; Kate Winslet



  • Sparced
    May 3, 08:07 AM
    $200 difference between 21.5" and 27" iMac and the rest of the specs are the same, is it usually that price?



    more...


    kate winslet titanic portrait. katewins
  • katewins



  • Eldiablojoe
    Apr 28, 01:42 PM
    Oh Vey, will you two just get a room already!





    kate winslet titanic portrait. kate winslet ralph fiennes the
  • kate winslet ralph fiennes the



  • bankshot
    Nov 3, 07:10 PM
    Parallels takes way too long to launch, and the GUI sucks.

    Mine pops up instantly. 2.0 GHz Macbook. What's wrong with the GUI? Is it just that it's not Cocoa, the holy grail, or is there something tangible that isn't good? I've found it easy to use and unobtrusive.

    Plus, do you really think a Qt C++ wrapper around Carbon is faster than direct Cocoa calls? :rolleyes:

    Wouldn't surprise me a bit if it were. Many of the things that make Cocoa such a joy for programmers also slow it down at runtime. That's just a design decision that Apple made, and with faster computers always coming out, it becomes less of a drawback at runtime.

    I just want a nice documented-based Cocoa app that behaves like a Mac app, with a fast virtualization at its core :)

    Err, why should a virtual machine be document-based? That doesn't make any sense to me.

    The whole thing that drew my attention to your original post was that comment about Cocoa. Why do you, as an end-user, care about that? Cocoa is great, but there seems to be a mentality here that anything else is inferior or a second-class citizen. I kind of understand why that mentality came to be - Cocoa came with OS X, Carbon is a bridge to the past in OS 9. Thus people automatically assumed that Cocoa = good and Carbon = bad. But Carbon is every bit as capable as Cocoa, and thus why an end-user would care one bit about either is beyond me.

    Granted, Parallels is done with Qt, which looks a little bit "off" sitting next to a Carbon or Cocoa app, but does that really matter? It looks damn close, and frankly, looks mean nothing to me if the interface works intuitively. And that it does.

    I'm not picking on you, just trying to understand your reasoning. ;)



    more...


    kate winslet titanic portrait. Kate Winslet Titanic: kate
  • Kate Winslet Titanic: kate



  • 7on
    Jul 25, 10:16 AM
    oh, I forgot to mention one good thing about this mouse. Presumably it will work correctly with the option "allow bluetooth devices to wake this computer." 3rd party mice wake the computer up over and over ever since 10.4.6 when that option is checked. Of course, it would be nicer if apple would just fix their stupid OS version so that all BT mice worked correctly and not just their own... :rolleyes:

    3rd party mice "phone home" to the computer thus waking it up. 3rd party mice need to fix this.





    kate winslet titanic portrait. Kate Winslet Proud of Her
  • Kate Winslet Proud of Her



  • toniv
    Dec 2, 01:50 AM
    Hi, you all!

    This iAdware thing is old news and has been already fixed in latest security update by Apple.

    Greetings from Finland,
    Toni

    Installer

    CVE-ID: CVE-2006-4404

    Available for: Mac OS X v10.3.9, Mac OS X Server v10.3.9, Mac OS X v10.4.8, Mac OS X Server v10.4.8

    Impact: When installing software as an Admin user, system privileges may be used without explicit authorization

    Description: Admin users are normally required to authenticate before executing commands with system privileges. However, the Installer allows system privileges to be used by Admin users when installing certain packages without requiring authentication. This update addresses the issue by requiring authentication before installing software with system privileges.





    kate winslet titanic portrait. Kate Winslet - Titanic
  • Kate Winslet - Titanic



  • Eidorian
    Apr 13, 02:06 PM
    I think the changes to the latest Apple TV is a sign of where Apple wants to be headed. The next Apple TV will be even smaller and come free when you buy a Mac, iPad, or iPhone. Wait and see! Just like giving e-mail away helps Google's ecosystem, so does getting Apple TVs into people's houses help Apple's ecosystem.I want to believe.

    Then again we are talking about the company that is nickel and diming for nearly every formerly included accessory now.





    SciFrog
    Oct 13, 01:58 PM
    Console client, no third party items...





    SactoGuy18
    Apr 14, 06:28 AM
    Sorry, not likely to happen given the razor-thin profit margins for televisions nowadays, especially when you have Samsung, Sony, VIZIO, Panasonic, LG and a couple of other brands fighting it out already in the large-screen flat-panel market.

    Now, a larger, more-sophisticated Apple TV box connected to your TV via the HDMI port, that's quite something else....





    Adidas Addict
    Apr 28, 03:57 PM
    Someone get a micrometer or vernier caliper and check this, looks the same size on the photos to me.





    SR20DETDOG
    Apr 5, 05:00 AM
    http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/6686/wtr3.jpg
    Wow, that is absolutely stunning and beautiful shot. Looks fanastic:D





    morespce54
    Jun 9, 04:19 PM
    What is this kid doing on the computer alone in the first place? Doesn't his parents know about the dangers lurking on the web?! ;)

    Well, he was on a iPod Touch, not on a computer (and even possibly in the same room as his mother).



    No comments:

    Post a Comment